
July put the structural machinery of healthcare on the table at once. The 340B program crossed 100 billion dollars, a state audit caught a PBM running a shell game, physician pay fell again, and advocacy fought to stay in the room while employer coverage buckled.
Look at where the money actually moves in healthcare and you stop arguing about drug prices alone. July 2026 pulled the floorboards up on the whole system at once. The 340B discount program crossed 100 billion dollars, a state audit caught a pharmacy benefit manager pocketing 100 million more, and physician pay dropped again. I have spent more than two decades inside this industry, and I have rarely watched this many structural fights break open in a single month. Patients did not start any of these fights, yet every one of them decides whether a patient gets the drug. Four forces shaped July, and they map onto policy, cost, community, and technology.
POLICY PULSE: POLITICAL
Washington moved more healthcare legislation this month than at any point in two years, and most of it aimed at the pipes patients never see. Every fight below reshapes access before a prescription reaches a pharmacy counter.
CMS proposed cutting 340B outpatient reimbursement from ASP plus 6 percent to ASP minus 33 percent in its 2027 OPPS rule, and competing bills landed alongside it. The bipartisan House SECURE 340B Act and Senator Cassidy's Senate draft mark the first serious attempt to modernize the program since 1992, so market access teams without a 340B strategy are flying blind on a channel that touches one in six drug dollars.
The Patients First Act would tie Medicare physician reimbursement to inflation for the first time, and two Medicare Advantage bills cleared House Ways and Means 42 to 0 on electronic prior authorization and revenue disclosure. Critics now peg Medicare Advantage overpayments near 140 billion dollars a year, and Representative Doggett is pushing a bipartisan bill to curb the practice. When a vote goes 42 to 0, something real is happening, and commercial teams should build their payer strategy around it.
A federal judge blocked Colorado's Prescription Drug Affordability Board from enforcing its upper payment limit on Amgen's Enbrel, freezing the boldest state price-cap experiment in the country. Every state building an affordability board now watches this case, and the tool patients hoped would cap their costs sits in legal limbo.
Policy sets the terms, but policy follows the money, and in July the money piled up in plain sight.

COST OF CARE: ECONOMIC
Follow the money out of Washington and it lands in three places: the 340B program, the PBM middle, and the shrinking pool of people who can still afford coverage. Each one drains resources meant for patients, and each one grew this month.
HRSA reported that 340B purchases hit 100 billion dollars in 2025, up from 16.2 billion in 2016 and now more than 16 percent of US drug spending, with ten drugs driving over a quarter of the total. Congress built the program to help safety-net providers stretch limited dollars, and the gap between that purpose and a 100 billion dollar channel is where the political pressure now sits.
An Iowa Medicaid audit found a major PBM generated more than 100 million dollars in profit through accounting built to circumvent the state's ban on spread pricing. Auditors called it a shell game, and every dollar a PBM hides inside a Medicaid program is a dollar that never reached patient care.
A JAMA study of more than 2 million first-time brand-drug fills found insurers rejected 32 percent of initial attempts through formulary exclusions, prior authorization, and step therapy, while ACA insurers proposed a median 14 percent premium hike for 2027. The barrier is no longer the price of the drug, it is the coverage decision made before the patient reaches the pharmacy.
Numbers this size stop being abstractions when a patient loses coverage or a caregiver files for bankruptcy. That is where the advocacy community lives, and that is where July got personal.
The Next Breakout Might Be in Your Pocket
Everyone’s hunting for the next Unicorn.
The type of “category disruptor” that grows fast and turns early believers into big winners.
59,000+ investors think that Mode Mobile could be one of those rare finds.
Americans spend 4 ½ hours on their phones daily, and Mode Mobile is monetizing that screentime. With $1B+ earned by over 490M customers and 32,481% revenue growth, Mode’s EarnPhone is turning smartphones into income generating assets.
Their previous raises sold out, and the company is now offering pre-IPO shares at $0.52/share with up to 20% bonus, exclusive to early investors.
Being early is everything, and this window is still open.
*Please read the offering circular and related risks at invest.modemobile.com.
Mode Mobile recently received their ticker reservation with Nasdaq ($MODE), indicating an intent to IPO in the next 24 months. An intent to IPO is no guarantee that an actual IPO will occur.
The Deloitte rankings are based on submitted applications and public company database research, with winners selected based on their fiscal-year revenue growth percentage over a three-year period.
COMMUNITY LENS: SOCIOCULTURAL
Strip away the dollar figures and you find the people the system forgets to seat at the table. The advocacy function exists to put them there, and this month tested whether it still can.
North Carolina built a healthcare affordability commission and seated hospitals, insurers, employers, and agencies, but no patients. Patients hold expertise no claims database captures, from denied prior authorizations to the real cost of an appeal, so advocacy that means anything puts a patient in the seat, not a summary of one.
Since 2000, 743 acute-care hospitals closed while hundreds opened, but the closures cluster in low-income counties while 73 percent of the new hospitals opened in the richest 40 percent of the country. Wendell Potter matched the closure data to county income and found a clear pattern, so access now depends on the zip code a patient lives in. Advocacy that ignores where care physically exists misses the barrier that stops treatment before cost ever enters the conversation.
Bristol Myers Squibb published a white paper on early patient engagement, built with advocacy partners, documenting how it moved patient voice into clinical development. Companies that seat patients before the launch move in concert with the community, and companies that skip that step learn what patients think from a press release.
Advocacy that stays only on the clinical side loses, because the barrier moved to plan design and program structure. The organizations that build fluency across both win the seat, and technology is reshaping that terrain fast.
TECH TRENDS: TECHNOLOGY
Innovation moved on two tracks this month, one that expands what medicine can do and one that exposes what happens when speed outruns safety. Both land on the patient, and both demand that advocacy pay attention.
Oncologists called Revolution Medicines' daraxonrasib the biggest pancreatic cancer advance in decades, comparable to the first checkpoint inhibitors, and convened a panel to work through what comes next. Pancreatic cancer has carried some of the lowest survival rates in oncology for twenty years, and the trial result is the beginning of the access work, not the end of it.
Former LifeMD employees told STAT that providers were expected to review roughly 25 cases per hour across a base of 365,000 subscribers, and the FDA named Dexcom the first participant in a pilot that lets digital health devices skip premarket authorization in exchange for real-world evidence. Digital-first care is scaling faster than the guardrails around it, so advocacy has to hold telehealth prescribers and AI-enabled devices to a real safety standard.
Anthropic announced it will develop its own drugs and released Claude Science aimed at biopharma R&D, with a stated focus on rare disease where the biology is clear but the economics are not. AI is moving from the lab bench toward the pipeline, and advocacy organizations that understand how these tools shape research priorities will shape who benefits from them.
Technology decides more of the access equation every year, and the advocacy community can join that conversation or find out how it turned out.

Closing Perspective
Every story this month traced back to the same structural truth. The machinery that decides whether a patient gets care, the 340B channel, the PBM middle, the physician payment formula, the insurance plan itself, operates almost entirely out of the patient's view, and July pulled it into the light. Insight without execution changes nothing, and the organizations that win this year connect what they know about patients to what they build for them. I have spent more than two decades watching companies confuse a patient slide for a patient strategy. The ones that align business performance with patient impact are the ones patients will still trust when the machinery gets rebuilt.
Call to Action
Find out where your advocacy function actually stands. The Advocacy Influence Diagnostic takes five minutes, measures your internal influence and your strategic risk, and returns immediate results at no cost. The 2026 ELAVAY Report is available now, the only syndicated research that tells you how patient advocacy organizations actually evaluate your company, and planning for the 2027 edition is open. For the diagnostic, ELAVAY access, or a conversation about any of the fights above, reach me at [email protected] or [email protected]. Explore the patient-facing work at wethepatients.org and the advocacy resources at advocatebridge.org. The machinery is being rebuilt right now, so decide whether your organization helps hold the pen.


